Dynamics of Humanitarian Priorities in the Political Life of the Independent Ukraine: The Dilemma of Intentions and Actions

Dynamics of Humanitarian Priorities in the Political Life of the Independent Ukraine: The Dilemma of Intentions and Actions

Blog Article

The dynamics of humanitarian priorities in the political life of the Ukrainian society are investigated.It is shown that the humanitarian priorities of the state policy must be determined by the national interests of the whole society, the protection of the rights and freedoms of its citizens.Basic humanitarian priorities include the level of human development, democratic society, high standards of living, gender equality, and more.

The following characteristics are important for the formation of a consolidated political nation: common national interests, preservation of historical memory, resolution of interethnic and interdenominational issues, establishment of social tolerance and consensus.The dynamics of the processes of decommunization, language policy, acquisition of local status by the BEANIES Ukrainian church have been traced.Some inconsistency and contradiction between the intentions and actions of the higher authorities in determining the priorities of state humanitarian policy have been revealed.

Also, some regressive manifestations and deviations from the strategic orientations of state formation are observed.The decisive factor in such phenomena is the destructive influence of external factors, in particular the Russian one, aimed at the formation of separatist and collaborative movements in the Ukrainian society, social disagreement and disobedience, disorder and chaos.The military aggression of the Russian Federation and its annexation of a part of the Ukrainian territory became a direct challenge and threat to the very existence of the state, guaranteed rights ORG LENTILS CAN and freedoms of its citizens.

Special attention is paid to the procedural incompleteness of reforms in the humanitarian sphere, which is manifested, in particular, in the declarative nature and lack of practical decisions and actions on the implementation of a number of strategic state projects.